Congratulation In Japanese New Born

A private health system and 'solidarity'?

The many debates that raises the expression of a conservative nationalism in Quebec is based mostly on an old dogma, is the traditional opposition between projects called 'left' and other 'right'. This oppositio n based on an idea firmly rooted that it is not forbidden to examine more closely. It is common indeed to see the object search for solidarity, protection and equality towards the 'left' and that of accountability, freedom of choice and efficiency, the side of the 'right'. Now it is plausible that these values can all find their expression.

Let's be more concrete. Quebecers and Canadians are sensitive to equality of rights before the disease, are reluctant to sanction the increase in health services under a system set to 'two speed' - one for the wealthy and one for the class penniless. Is it not conceivable in this context, to inform the public the names of private health clinics that would provide free access (although necessarily quota) to customers the less fortunate in society, in turn contri butions from private market? It could be to classify health clinics based on their contribution to this spirit of g e n é é blushes , so that clinics 'not participating' to arise alongside clinical 'participating' and 'copies'. The more affluent customer, eager to explore the private sphere in this area would have the opportunity to make an informed choice originally. Similarly, a segment of the population does not care about the 'solidarity' economic, others attach significance - apart from the effect of social norms (d e s) approval. This is besides the state could also provide support here - by granting licensure subject to the implementation of redistributive measures in private clinics. It is also possible that the clinical exemplary solidarity become the most popular, most profitable and efficient s; end line, the most beneficial. Between solidarity forced e e solidarity and voluntary, is there not also a world to think?

consommarchiques as modern initiatives are being tested in Scandinavia (to counter discriminatory practices in the company) while others are better known in the mainstream of 'fair trade' (to protect the environment, future generations and vulnerable workers, for example). All have in common is that they do evaporate the left-right divide, encouraging responsible sharing of the fruits of e development. In the context where the State has the power to support the development of such initiatives, there is no doubt that one or the other existing political parties not to herald it. More than d e development of modals s e a r administrative e regime nine, the pack û tasks the equal potential constitutional may pose the greatest of e fi organizational to this project (except perhaps a certain establishment ideologues). With regard to facilitating the conditions here to excercise the fundamental right to life, reason-to ê be of emb û tasks it is irr e m e devilishly discrete é é said e.

emphasized again that id éologues not fail to oppose this type of initiative. Yesterday they were opposed to all 'system è me to two-tier' in the name of a certain conception of equalit é. Here we invoke the barriers 'r éalisme': for what consumers care relatively wealthy és would they be sensitive to the pain of being éreux ?! of homo solidarius ?! In the meantime, a neurologist may do ê to be the emonstration that S candinaves enjoy ' heritage g en etic diff erent from that analysts' free and e ind hanging "of si è does contemporary .